Why the study?
Although intraplaque haemorrhage is associated with carotid plaque vulnerability and stroke, MRI sequence standardization is needed to compare studies, and the risks associated with different stages require further clarification.
Does MRI detection of carotid intraplaque haemorrhage predict plaque rupture and ischemic stroke?
Does MRI detection of carotid intraplaque haemorrhage predict plaque rupture and ischemic stroke?
MRI detection of carotid intraplaque hemorrhage is a promising non-invasive method to predict plaque vulnerability and ischemic stroke risk, though standardization of sequences is needed.
May support MRI for carotid plaque risk stratification; leaves open standardization and prospective validation before practice change.
Vulnerable carotid atherosclerotic plaques are characterised by several risk factors, such as inflammation, neovascularization and intraplaque haemorrhage (IPH). Vulnerable plaques can lead to ischemic events such as stroke. Many studies reported a relationship between IPH, plaque rupture, and ischemic stroke. Histology is the gold standard to evaluate IPH, but it required carotid endarterectomy (CEA) surgery to collect the tissue sample. In this context, several imaging methods can be used as a non-invasive way to evaluate plaque vulnerability and detect IPH. Most imaging studies showed that IPH is associated with plaque vulnerability and stroke, with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) being the most sensitive and specific to detect IPH as a predictor of ischemic events. These conclusions are however still debated because of the limited number of patients included in these studies; further studies are required to better assess risks associated with different IPH stages. Moreover, IPH is implicated in plaque vulnerability with other risk factors which need to be considered to predict ischemic risk. In addition, MRI sequences standardization is required to compare results from different studies and agree on biomarkers that need to be considered to predict plaque rupture. In these circumstances, IPH detection by MRI could be an efficient clinical method to predict stroke. The goal of this review article is to first describe the pathophysiological process responsible for IPH, its histological detection in carotid plaques and its correlation with plaque rupture. The second part will discuss the benefits and limitations of imaging the carotid plaque, and finally the clinical interest of imaging IPH to predict plaque rupture, focusing on MRI-IPH.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mura et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: