PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 23, 2005Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology111 citations

Interpreting the Trail Making Test Following Traumatic Brain Injury: Comparison of Traditional Time Scores and Derived Indices

View Full Paper
RLRael T. LangeGIGrant L. IversonMZMartin J. Zakrzewski

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the clinical application of traditional time scores and various derived indices from the Trail Making Test (TMT) in a sample of 571 patients with acute traumatic brain injury (TBI). Participants were classified into four injury severity groups. A clear linear relation between injury severity and TMT performance was demonstrated, with the more severely brain injured patients performing more poorly on most measures. Hierarchical logistic regression analysis of TMT time scores across binary extreme groups based on injury severity resulted in high classification rates for patients with very mild TBI (93.0% correctly classified) and low classification rates for patients with moderate to severe TBI (50.0% correctly classified). However, TMT derived indices did not provide a unique contribution to test interpretation beyond what is already available from Part A and B separately.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Lange et al. (2005) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a008697581c6e761e77c5e9https://doi.org/10.1080/1380339049091290
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper