Historical analysis reveals divergent perspectives on immediate Philippine independence among early twentieth-century political leaders, highlighting complexities in colonial-era legislative advocacy.
Many historians have accepted the view that the two prominent Filipino leaders — Manuel Quezon and Sergio Osmena — were not really in favour of immediate Philippine independence despite their constant open advocacy of such an aspiration. For instance, Roy W. Curry wrote that “… the eloquent Quezon was playing independence as a necessary political expedience while privately fearing that it might be granted”, whereas Bonifacio S. Salamanca suggested “… at least the two foremost leaders of the Filipino elite — Quezon and Osmena — did not really desire immediate independence, or even want to have a date fixed for the future recognition of Philippine independence”.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wong Kwok Chu (1982) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: