± 26]) was monitored in six participants by using a minimally invasive temperature sensor; four participants were treated without real-time thermometry. For all participants, CT images were used with a patient-specific hyperthermia model to define focused ultrasound treatment plans. Feasibility was assessed by comparing model-prescribed focused ultrasound powers to those implemented for treatment. Safety was assessed by evaluating MR images and biopsy specimens for evidence of thermal ablation and monitoring adverse events. Results The mean difference between predicted and implemented treatment powers was -0.1 W ± 17.7 (n = 10). No evidence of focused ultrasound-related adverse effects, including thermal ablation, was found. Conclusion In this 10-participant study, the authors confirmed the feasibility of using focused ultrasound-mediated hyperthermia planning models to define treatment parameters that safely enabled targeted, noninvasive drug delivery to liver tumors while monitored with B-mode guidance and without real-time thermometry. Published under a CC BY 4.0 license. Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Dickey and Levi-Polyachenko in this issue.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gray et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: