Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study was to determine the effects of cold ischaemia time (CIT) on living donor kidney transplant recipients in a large national data set. METHODS: Data from the National Health Service Blood and Transplant and UK Renal Registry databases for all patients receiving a living donor kidney transplant in the UK between January 2001 and December 2014 were analysed. Patients were divided into three groups depending on CIT (less than 2 h, 2-4 h, 4-8 h). Risk-adjusted outcomes were assessed by multivariable analysis adjusting for discordance in both donor and recipient characteristics. RESULTS: Outcomes of 9156 transplants were analysed (CIT less than 2 h in 2662, 2-4 h in 4652, and 4-8 h in 1842). After adjusting for confounders, there was no significant difference in patient survival between CIT groups. Recipients of kidneys with a CIT of 4-8 h had excellent graft outcomes, although these were slightly inferior to outcomes in those with a CIT of less than 2 h, with risk-adjusted rates of delayed graft function of 8·6 versus 4·3 per cent, and 1-year graft survival rates of 96·2 versus 97·1 per cent, respectively. CONCLUSION: The detrimental effect of prolonging CIT for up to 8 h in living donation kidney transplantation is marginal.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nath et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: