Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: Over the past two decades, the importance of genetic factors in the development of FSGS has become increasingly clear. However, despite many known monogenic causes of FSGS, single gene defects explain only 30% of cases. METHODS: To investigate mutations underlying FSGS, we sequenced 662 whole exomes from individuals with sporadic or familial FSGS. After quality control, we analyzed the exome data from 363 unrelated family units with sporadic or familial FSGS and compared this to data from 363 ancestry-matched controls. We used rare variant burden tests to evaluate known disease-associated genes and potential new genes. Network analysis showed that top-ranked new genes were located closer than a random set of genes to known FSGS genes. CONCLUSIONS: Although our analysis validated many known FSGS-causing genes, we detected a nontrivial number of purported "disease-causing" variants in controls, implying that filtering is inadequate to allow clinical diagnosis and decision making. Genetic diagnosis in patients with FSGS is complicated by the nontrivial rate of variants in known FSGS genes among people without kidney disease.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: