This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
ABSTRACTThe dominant response within higher education to the emergence of free online text- and graphic-generating software has been a concern with identifying AI usage in students' work. We argue that this is both a waste of time and neglects our educational responsibilities. A police-catch-punish approach to AI, as with the use of this process in relation to plagiarism, ignores the broader purposes of higher education. If higher education is understood as being a space for nurturing transformative relationships with knowledge, AI can be harnessed to enhance learning experiences. Such an approach would also enable a critical understanding of the limitations and ethical deliberations around AI usage. Those critical academics who emphasise transformative learning over surveillance-driven approaches are likely to foster more meaningful higher education experiences.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kramm et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: