Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The potentially favorable interaction of a propeller slipstream with a wingtip is a complex problem, because of the importance of vortex interaction and viscous effects. This paper examines the capability of different propeller modeling methods in a Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) solver for the simulation of wingtip-mounted propellers. The applicability of actuator-disk and actuator-line models to reduce the cost of propeller modeling is investigated in its most accurate form, by applying propeller-blade-loading results extracted from simulations, in which the blades are fully resolved. The numerical results are validated by comparison with measurement data from in-house wind-tunnel experiments. It is concluded that the aerodynamic interactions for the wingtip-mounted propeller in tractor configuration can be predicted by RANS simulations with a simple one-equation turbulence model (Spalart–Allmaras), provided that the uncertainty due to numerical diffusion is accounted for by a grid-dependency study, or reduced by local grid refinement. The actuator-line model reduced the computational time by 17% without introducing errors into the time-accurate and time-averaged wing loading. The actuator-disk model reduces the computational cost by 85% by removing time dependency, with a small penalty in the accuracy of the time-averaged flowfield and a 3.9% overprediction of the wing lift.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stokkermans et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: