Why the study?
Does percutaneous repair of paravalvular prosthetic regurgitation improve outcomes in patients with symptomatic paravalvular prosthetic regurgitation?
Does percutaneous repair of paravalvular prosthetic regurgitation improve outcomes in patients with symptomatic paravalvular prosthetic regurgitation?
Percutaneous repair is a highly efficacious therapy for symptomatic paravalvular prosthetic regurgitation, offering a viable alternative to high-risk open surgical correction.
May support procedural discussions in experienced centers; leaves open whether percutaneous repair improves clinical outcomes versus alternatives.
Paravalvular prosthetic regurgitation is common, affecting 5-10% of surgical prostheses and 40-70% of transcatheter valves. While many patients may suffer no significant morbidity, paravalvular prosthetic regurgitation can lead to heart failure and haemolytic anaemia, and, in some studies, has been associated with impaired survival. Over the past several years, percutaneous repair of paravalvular prosthetic regurgitation has been demonstrated to be a highly efficacious therapy. When performed in experienced centres, procedural success with percutaneous repair occurs in 90% of patients. Due to the complex nature of the techniques, there is a significant learning curve with a high potential for prolonged procedures (∼2.5 h) and complications (∼5%), although death is rare (∼0.5%). Percutaneous repair of paravalvular prosthetic regurgitation requires a close collaboration between imaging specialists, surgeons and the interventional operators. Importantly, successful percutaneous repair obviates the need for open surgical correction, which can be high risk or prohibitive due to the need for reoperation in the setting of comorbidities. Herein, we discuss appropriate patient selection, the catheter-based techniques and outcomes of percutaneous repair for symptomatic paravalvular prosthetic regurgitation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sorajja et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: