Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
How should we think about challenging behavior? Behaviorist approaches tend to dominate the field, but new approaches make power, inequality, and resistance central to their analysis. I explore four approaches that resist dominant behaviorist approaches: embracing neurodiversity, recognizing inequality, seeing resistance, and loving redemption. Stories about my experience with my autistic brother expose limits in each of these four approaches. Building on critical autism studies, I propose a new interdisciplinary field of Challenging Behavior Studies that makes power central, embraces multiple perspectives and complexity, and aims to improve the quality of life of all those affected.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stacy Clifford Simplican (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: