Why the study?
The safety profile, adverse effects, and necessity of RNA- or DNA-based COVID-19 vaccines with unclear long-term effects required evaluation in at-risk and healthy populations during the omicron era.
What is the safety profile and necessity of RNA/DNA-based COVID-19 vaccines in patients with autoimmune diseases, cardiac issues, and the general population?
What is the safety profile and necessity of RNA/DNA-based COVID-19 vaccines in patients with autoimmune diseases, cardiac issues, and the general population?
This review debates the necessity and safety of mRNA/DNA COVID-19 vaccines in specific at-risk and healthy populations given the emergence of less aggressive variants and available therapeutics.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Questions vaccine necessity in healthy and at-risk groups amid Omicron; leaves open updated risk-benefit data for cardiac and autoimmune patients.
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been a challenge for the whole world since the beginning of 2020, and COVID-19 vaccines were considered crucial for disease eradication. Instead of producing classic vaccines, some companies pointed to develop products that mainly function by inducing, into the host, the production of the antigenic protein of SARS-CoV-2 called Spike, injecting an instruction based on RNA or a DNA sequence. Here, we aim to give an overview of the safety profile and the actual known adverse effects of these products in relationship with their mechanism of action. We discuss the use and safety of these products in at-risk people, especially those with autoimmune diseases or with previously reported myocarditis, but also in the general population. We debate the real necessity of administering these products with unclear long-term effects to at-risk people with autoimmune conditions, as well as to healthy people, at the time of omicron variants. This, considering the existence of therapeutic interventions, much more clearly assessed at present compared to the past, and the relatively lower aggressive nature of the new viral variants.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Frasca et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: