Two-year results from a randomized clinical trial of revascularization in patients with intermittent claudication

BACKGROUND: Intermittent claudication is associated with significant impairment of health-related quality of life. The use of revascularization techniques to improve health-related quality of life remains controversial. METHODS: Patients with intermittent claudication due to iliac or femoropopliteal peripheral artery disease were enrolled in the IRONIC trial. They were randomized to either best medical therapy (BMT), including a structured, non-supervised exercise programme, or revascularization with either endovascular or open techniques in addition to BMT. The primary outcome was health-related quality of life at 2 years assessed using the Short Form 36 (SF-36(®) ) questionnaire. Secondary outcomes included VascuQoL questionnaire results, treadmill walking distances and achievement of patient-specified treatment goals. RESULTS: Both randomized groups had improved health-related quality of life and treadmill walking distance at 2-year follow-up. Overall SF-36(®) physical component summary score, three SF-36(®) physical domain scores, overall VascuQoL score, and three of five VascuQoL domain scores showed significantly greater improvement in the group that also received invasive treatment. Intermittent claudication distance on a graded treadmill improved more in the revascularization + BMT group (117 versus 55 m; P = 0·003) whereas maximum walking distance and 6-min walk test distance were similar. Some 44 per cent of patients in the revascularization + BMT group reported they had fully achieved their treatment goal versus 10 per cent in the BMT group. CONCLUSION: A revascularization strategy with unsupervised exercise improved health-related quality of life and intermittent claudication distance more than standard BMT and an unsupervised exercise programme in patients with lifestyle-limiting claudication. REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01219842 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).