Why the study?
Does computational vascular fluid-structure interaction modeling improve the prediction of patient-specific hemodynamics in cerebral aneurysms compared to a rigid arterial wall assumption?
Population
Four patient-specific computational models of cerebral aneurysms
Comparison
Computational vascular fluid-structure… vs Rigid arterial wall assumption
Design
Preclinical
Authors
Loading...
Should not yet change rigid-wall modeling in practice; hypothesis-generating for fluid-structure interaction in aneurysms.
Does computational vascular fluid-structure interaction modeling improve the prediction of patient-specific hemodynamics in cerebral aneurysms compared to a rigid arterial wall assumption?
Computational fluid-structure interaction modeling provides more accurate predictions of patient-specific hemodynamics in cerebral aneurysms than traditional rigid wall models.
Bazilevs et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: