Why the study?
Does flexible wall modeling compared to rigid wall modeling affect the prediction of hemodynamic quantities in a patient-specific Fontan connection?
Does flexible wall modeling compared to rigid wall modeling affect the prediction of hemodynamic quantities in a patient-specific Fontan connection?
This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
The Fontan procedure is a surgery that is performed on single-ventricle heart patients, and, due to the wide range of anatomies and variations among patients, lends itself nicely to study by advanced numerical methods. We focus on a patient-specific Fontan configuration, and perform a fully coupled fluid–structure interaction (FSI) analysis of hemodynamics and vessel wall motion. To enable physiologically realistic simulations, a simple approach to constructing a variable-thickness blood vessel wall description is proposed. Rest and exercise conditions are simulated and rigid versus flexible vessel wall simulation results are compared. We conclude that flexible wall modeling plays an important role in predicting quantities of hemodynamic interest in the Fontan connection. To the best of our knowledge, this paper presents the first three-dimensional patient-specific fully coupled FSI analysis of a total cavopulmonary connection that also includes large portions of the pulmonary circulation.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Incorporating flexible vessel wall modeling in computational simulations of the Fontan circulation is important for accurate hemodynamic predictions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bazilevs et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: