Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
July 13, 2016Politics & GenderOpen Access

Quotas and Women's Substantive Representation: Evidence from a Content Analysis of Ugandan Plenary Debates

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

ACAmanda ClaytonUniversity of California SystemCJCecilia JosefssonUppsala UniversityVWVibeke WangChr. Michelsen Institute

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Clayton et al. (2016) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0126302ff633f365783ffehttps://doi.org/10.1017/s1743923x16000453
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Ministerial Responsiveness in Westminster Systems: Institutional Choices and House of Commons Debate, 1832–19152014 · 58 citations
  2. 2How women legislate1994 · 570 citations
  3. 3Constituting Women's Interests through Representative Claims2014 · 193 citations
  4. 4‘THICK’ CONCEPTIONS OF SUBSTANTIVE REPRESENTATION: WOMEN, GENDER AND POLITICAL INSTITUTIONS2008 · 135 citations
  5. 5International Politics and the Spread of Quotas for Women in Legislatures2011 · 410 citations