Why the study?
Viral myocarditis causes myocardial damage in COVID-19 patients, but complete diagnostic evaluation is often hindered by logistical challenges transporting critically ill patients for radiology imaging.
Does bedside speckle-tracking echocardiography correlate with total scar burden on CMR and predict functional recovery at 6 months in patients with COVID-19-related myocarditis?
Does bedside speckle-tracking echocardiography correlate with total scar burden on CMR and predict functional recovery at 6 months in patients with COVID-19-related myocarditis?
Bedside speckle-tracking echocardiography (GLS) correlates with CMR scar burden and independently predicts 6-month functional recovery in patients with COVID-19 myocarditis.
GLS may support bedside prognostication in COVID-19 myocarditis; leaves open its integration versus CMR pending prospective trials.
SARS-CoV2 infection, responsible for the COVID-19 disease, can determine cardiac as well as respiratory injury. In COVID patients, viral myocarditis can represent an important cause of myocardial damage. Clinical presentation of myocarditis is heterogeneous. Furthermore, the full diagnostic algorithm can be hindered by logistical difficulties related to the transportation of COVID-19 patients in a critical condition to the radiology department. Our aim was to study longitudinal systolic cardiac function in patients with COVID-19-related myocarditis with echocardiography and to compare these findings with cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) results. Patients with confirmed acute myocarditis and age- and gender-matched healthy controls were enrolled. Both patients with COVID-19-related myocarditis and healthy controls underwent standard transthoracic echocardiography and speckle-tracking analysis at the moment of admission and after 6 months of follow-up. The data of 55 patients with myocarditis (mean age 46.4 ± 15.3, 70% males) and 55 healthy subjects were analyzed. The myocarditis group showed a significantly reduced global longitudinal strain (GLS) and sub-epicardial strain, compared to the control (p < 0.001). We found a positive correlation (r = 0.65, p < 0.0001) between total scar burden (TSB) on CMR and LV GLS. After 6 months of follow-up, GLS showed marked improvements in myocarditis patients on optimal medical therapy (p < 0.01). Furthermore, we showed a strong association between baseline GLS, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and TSB with LVEF at 6 months of follow-up. After a multivariable linear regression analysis, baseline GLS, LVEF and TSB were independent predictors of a functional outcome at follow-up (p < 0.0001). Cardiac function and myocardial longitudinal deformation, assessed by echocardiography, are associated with TSB at CMR and have a predictive value of functional recovery in the follow-up.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
D’Andrea et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: