Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
It has been proven that the properties of non-linearity, multi-disturbance, and time-variation are the main factors affecting the performance of the electromechanical actuator (EMA) for guided artillery rockets. In particular, its controller should have good dynamic characteristics and strong anti-disturbance features when the projectile is maneuvered at the end of its guidance. For these reasons, an active disturbance rejection controller (ADRC) was designed for a guided artillery rocket’s EMA with a ball screw drive. Compared to other control methods, it has been shown that the ADRC had a stronger disturbance rejection ability than PID, Fuzzy-PID, and BP-PID under the condition of 20% maximum control torque disturbance, and it also had a large stability margin and bandwidth.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Han et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: