Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Method validation study demonstrates rapid, high-recovery pesticide residue quantification in grain, suggesting an eco-friendly and time-efficient alternative to conventional liquid chromatography.
> 0.9991) and limits of quantification (0.4-40.0 μg/kg) were established for all nine pesticides. Satisfactory pesticide recovery rates (62.2%-107.4%) were obtained at three standard concentrations (50, 100, and 200 μg/kg), with relative standard deviations in the range of 2.1%-14.3%. The results confirmed that the proposed method was suitable for the routine detection of these pesticides in grain samples. Compared with high-performance liquid chromatography-MS/MS, the overall test run time and the amount of solvent required were reduced by 66% and 90%, respectively, when SFC-MS/MS was applied. Therefore, the use of SFC-MS/MS permits a shorter run time and affords greater analytical efficiency, such that it is both economical and environmentally sustainable.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xie et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: