Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We broadcast calls of grebes, rails, and bitterns, and passively counted other species, along 36 survey routes in Maine wetlands during 1989-92. Our objectives were to determine the magnitude and temporal variation in waterbird call-response rates, and to estimate, through computer simulation, the statistical power of variously configured monitoring programs. Average call-response rates on survey mini-routes ranged from 2.8 to 6.0 responses per 10-station mini-route, and temporal variation in counts was relatively high (CV in all species >80%). A power analysis, performed by coupling Monte Carlo methods with linear regression, indicated that changes in call-response rates of 10% would be difficult to detect over a 10-year monitoring period in any species. Changes of 25%, however, could be detected reliably (P > 0.90) by surveying 40-80 mini-routes on 2-3 occasions annually. Passive counts at call-response stations yielded useful abundance information on many wetland species currently undersampled by existing avian monitoring schemes. We conclude that call-response surveys for selected species, coupled with passive counts of other species, are a logistically feasible and statistically defensible means of monitoring trends in regional populations of wetland birds.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gibbs et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: