Why the study?
Does selective nNOS inhibition reduce blood flow and vascular conductance in rat hindlimb locomotor muscle at rest and during dynamic treadmill exercise?
Does selective nNOS inhibition reduce blood flow and vascular conductance in rat hindlimb locomotor muscle at rest and during dynamic treadmill exercise?
Selective nNOS inhibition reduces resting hindlimb muscle blood flow and vascular conductance in rats but does not affect the hyperaemic response during exercise.
nNOS inhibition reduces resting but not exercise hindlimb blood flow in rats; leaves open its role in human muscle perfusion.
Nitric oxide (NO) derived from endothelial NO synthase (eNOS) is an integral mediator of vascular control during muscle contractions. However, it is not known whether neuronal NOS (nNOS)-derived NO regulates tissue hyperaemia in healthy subjects, particularly during exercise. We tested the hypothesis that selective nNOS inhibition would reduce blood flow and vascular conductance (VC) in rat hindlimb locomotor muscle(s), kidneys and splanchnic organs at rest and during dynamic treadmill exercise (20 m min(-1), 10% grade). Nineteen male Sprague-Dawley rats (555 +/- 23 g) were assigned to either rest (n = 9) or exercise (n = 10) groups. Blood flow and VC were determined via radiolabelled microspheres before and after the intra-arterial administration of the selective nNOS inhibitor S-methyl-L-thiocitrulline (SMTC, 2.1 +/- 0.1 micromol kg(-1)). Total hindlimb muscle blood flow (control: 20 +/- 2 ml min(-1) 100g(-1), SMTC: 12 +/- 2 ml min(-1) 100g(-1), P < 0.05) and VC (control: 0.16 +/- 0.02 ml min(-1) 100 g(-1) mmHg(1), SMTC: 0.09 +/- 0.01 ml min(-1) 100 g(-1) mmHg(-1), P < 0.05) were reduced substantially at rest. Moreover, the magnitude of the absolute reduction in blood flow and VC correlated (P < 0.05) with the proportion of oxidative muscle fibres found in the individual muscles or muscle parts of the hindlimb. During exercise, total hindlimb blood flow (control: 108 +/- 7 ml min(-1) 100 g(-1), SMTC: 105 +/- 8 ml min(-1) 100 g(-1)) and VC (control: 0.77 +/- 0.06 ml min(-1) 100g(-1) mmHg(-1); SMTC: 0.70 +/- 0.05 ml min(-1) 100g(-1) mmHg(-1)) were not different (P > 0.05) between control and SMTC conditions. SMTC reduced (P < 0.05) blood flow and VC at rest and during exercise in the kidneys, adrenals and liver. These results enhance our understanding of the role of NO-mediated circulatory control by demonstrating that nNOS does not appear to subserve an obligatory role in the exercising muscle hyperaemic response in the rat.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Copp et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: