Why the study?
The value of delayed enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance and programmed ventricular stimulation for risk stratification, and whether CMR helps identify VA target sites in patients with LVNC, was unknown.
Do DE-CMR and PVS improve risk stratification and predict VT recurrence in patients with LVNC undergoing ablation for ventricular arrhythmias?
Do DE-CMR and PVS improve risk stratification and predict VT recurrence in patients with LVNC undergoing ablation for ventricular arrhythmias?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In patients with LVNC and ventricular arrhythmias, the presence of DE-CMR scar and VT inducibility strongly predict VT recurrence and can guide ablation targeting.
INTRODUCTION: Left ventricular noncompaction (LVNC) is associated with ventricular arrhythmias (VA) including premature ventricular complexes, and ventricular tachycardia (VT). The value of imaging with delayed enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance (DE-CMR) and programmed ventricular stimulation (PVS) for risk stratification in patients with VA and LVNC is unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine whether DE-CMR and PVS are beneficial for risk stratification and whether CMR helps to identify VA target sites. METHODS AND RESULTS: Consecutive patients with LVNC undergoing ablation for VAs were included, all patients had preprocedure DE-CMR. A total of 23 patients (7 women, 46 ± 14 years, ejection fraction 35 ± 14) were included and followed for 2.9 ± 2.2 years. DE-CMR scar was present in 12/23 patients (52%). PVS was performed in 20/23 patients, 8/10 patients (80%) with scar were inducible for VT compared to 0/10 (0%) patients without scar (p < .001). VA target sites in patients with scarring were located adjacent to areas of scarring in all but 1 patient and ablation was successful in 15/23 patients (65%). Patients with scar had worse survival free of VT than those without scar (log rank p = .01) and patients with inducible VT had worse survival free of VT than those who were noninducible (log rank p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: The presence of CMR defined scar in patients with LVNC was associated with inducible VT and worse outcomes. Inducibility for VT was associated with VT recurrence. Furthermore, CMR is beneficial in localizing the arrhythmogenic substrate in LVNC and therefore can aid in procedural planning.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gunda et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: