Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Demonstrates erosion mechanisms in loess slopes, indicating critical factors in geo-hazard assessment.
Integrated physical experiments and numerical simulations quantitatively elucidate erosion mechanisms of loess slopes under rainfall intensities of 20–60 mm/d, representing moderate to torrential events. Controlled laboratory scouring tests on Heifangtai loess samples demonstrate that hydro-mechanical processes driving slope failure are critically controlled by both rainfall intensity and slope geometry. Key findings reveal: (1) slope erosion progresses sequentially through splash erosion, rill development, and collapse, with transition time decreasing by over 30% under 60 mm/d compared to 20 mm/d; (2) cumulative sediment yield exhibits a strong positive correlation with slope inclination (30°–60°), where a 45° slope produces up to 25% more erosion than a 30° slope under identical rainfall; (3) numerical simulations quantify stability degradation, showing the safety factor drops to 2.84 after 24 h of rainfall at 60 mm/d. A critical divergence emerged at 40 mm/d, where the numerical safety factor initially exceeded the analytical solution but fell below it after 15 h, with a maximum discrepancy of 0.06, indicating simplified analytical methods may underestimate risks during prolonged moderate-intensity rainfall. This study provides quantitative insights and a validated modeling framework for geo-hazard assessment and slope mitigation strategies in loess regions under increasing rainfall extremes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lei et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: