Perspective explores the role of LLM agents in enhancing autonomous chemical research workflows, highlighting key challenges.
Large language model (LLM)-based agents are reshaping how self-driving laboratories (SDLs) may support autonomous chemical and materials research. Although SDLs have enabled major advances in mechanized experimentation and closed-loop optimization, their scientific utility remains limited when tasks require literature-grounded reasoning, adaptive coordination, and interpretation beyond predefined search spaces. In this perspective, we examine how LLM-based agents may help bridge this gap by translating scientific intent into machine-executable workflows. We propose a five-module framework─Comprehension, Design, Execution, Analysis, and Optimization─to organize the capabilities required for agent-enabled SDLs, and we discuss representative systems, including Coscientist, ChemCrow, LLM-RDF, and AI-Chemist, as milestones in this transition. We also emphasize that agent-enabled SDLs should not be conflated with autonomous scientific discovery. Safety in physical execution, hardware interoperability, reproducibility, and auditability remain central challenges. To support a more critical assessment, we introduce the HYDRA framework for benchmarking trustworthy agent-enabled workflows. Finally, we outline a human–AI–SDL collaborative model in which scientists remain responsible for scientific framing, interpretation, and oversight.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xie et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: