Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Investigates social comparison effects on self-esteem in students, suggesting implications for social media use.
The rapid ascent of Facebook as a dominant social networking platform has had a profound impact on students' social interactions and self-perceptions. This research, anchored in Leon Festinger's Social Comparison Theory (1954), examines the relationship between Facebook usage, social comparison, and self-esteem among students. Using a quantitative, cross-sectional design, data were collected from 590 students through a structured questionnaire incorporating validated scales such as the Iowa-Netherlands Comparison Orientation Measure and the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale. The findings indicate a positive correlation between Facebook usage and social comparison tendencies, consistent with previous studies (Vogel et al., 2014; Bonfanti et al., 2025). Moreover, social comparison is significantly negatively correlated with self-esteem, suggesting that students who frequently engage in comparisons with others tend to report lower self-worth (Irmer et al., 2023). The study also distinguishes between upward and downward comparisons, showing that upward comparisons significantly decrease self-esteem, while downward comparisons have a slight positive effect (Taylor, 2024). Regression and mediation analyses reveal that social comparison partially mediates the relationship between Facebook usage and self-esteem, aligning with findings by Bergagna and Tartaglia (2018). Additionally, the intensity of Facebook usage moderates this relationship, amplifying the negative impact of comparison on self-esteem (Wang et al., 2024). In summary, the results highlight that it is not merely the use of Facebook but the comparison processes it triggers that play a crucial role in shaping students' psychological well-being. The study underscores the need for awareness and interventions to promote healthier social media engagement among students.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vansh Rastogi, Muskan Prajapati, Amishi Rastogi, Gaurika Mishra (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: