Compares renal function outcomes post-transplant, indicating normothermic perfusion's benefits.
Background. No study has assessed the effect of end-ischemic normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) on renal function in simultaneous liver-kidney (SLK) transplantation. We hypothesized that by mitigating liver ischemia/reperfusion injury, NMP exerts a renoprotective effect on kidney allografts. This study compares renal outcomes in SLK transplant recipients receiving NMP versus static cold storage (SCS) livers. Methods. We analyzed deceased-donor SLK transplant recipients (January 2019–July 2024) with at least 6 mo follow-up (n = 85). Primary outcomes included delayed graft function (DGF) and functional-DGF (f-DGF; failure of serum creatinine to decrease 10% daily for 3 d in the first week). Liver Core Outcome Sets were reported. NMP recipients (n = 17) were propensity score–matched 1:2 to SCS controls (n = 34). Kidneys underwent hypothermic machine perfusion in both groups. Results. Cohorts were well matched, although NMP had more donation after circulatory death donors ( P = 0.006). f-DGF was significantly lower in NMP versus SCS (35% versus 68%, P = 0.025); this persisted in the hepatorenal syndrome subcohort (27% versus 65%, P = 0.03). Post–reperfusion syndrome was lower in NMP ( P = 0.041). NMP demonstrated superior renal function: lower peak creatinine (2.58 versus 3.03 mg/dL, P = 0.031), higher lowest postoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate (25 versus 19 mL/min/1.73 m 2 , P = 0.021), and reduced 6-mo dialysis requirement (6% versus 32%, P = 0.036). Conclusions. In this cohort, NMP was associated with improved early renal recovery in SLK transplant recipients, characterized by lower rates of f-DGF and higher estimated glomerular filtration rate. These findings suggest that mitigating liver ischemia via NMP may provide secondary benefits to the simultaneous kidney allograft.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nadeem et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: