Can Evaluation Policies Survive Democratic Erosion? Safeguarding Independence in International Organizations

International organizations' (IOs) evaluation policies face unprecedented threats from post‐truth dynamics—delegitimization of expertise, nationalist framing against multilateralism, authoritarian overconfidence, and anti‐scientific sentiment. Despite institutional convergence on independence safeguards, methodological standards, and normative frameworks, comparative analysis reveals distinct vulnerabilities to contemporary political pressures. Drawing on behavioral mechanisms of framing, illusion of control, and motivated reasoning, this commentary maps five potential systemic risks affecting evaluation policies even when formal institutions remain intact. Safeguarding strategies require multilevel coordination: transnational professional standards embedding peer accountability, institutional reforms protecting independence through deliberative techniques, and alternative evaluation capacities operating outside potentially captured systems.