Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Objectives To investigate associations of the bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA)-derived phase angle (PhA), an indicator of body cell mass, hydration status, and cell membrane integrity, with type 2 diabetes (T2D), prediabetes, and glycemic and insulin-related traits. Methods Using data from the Cooperative Health Research in the Region of Augsburg (KORA) S3/S4 studies, we analyzed 7728 participants aged 25–74 years for prevalent T2D and 7006 participants who did not have diabetes at baseline for incident T2D. A subsample aged 55–74 years at S4 was followed to assess incident oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT)-defined prediabetes or T2D (prediabetes/T2D), and glycemic and insulin-related traits (S4/F4/FF4). The PhA was calculated from BIA 2000-S at 50 kHz. Logistic and Cox regressions were applied for binary outcomes, and two-level growth models for continuous traits. Results In S3/S4, 324 participants had prevalent T2D at baseline, and 707 developed T2D during a median 15.7-year follow-up. In S4/F4/FF4, during up to 14 years of follow-up, 251 out of 626 normoglycemic participants at S4 developed incident prediabetes/T2D, and 792–804 participants without diabetes at S4 had three repeated measurements of continuous traits. The PhA (per 1-degree) was positively associated with incident T2D (hazard ratio [HR] and 95% confidence interval [CI] in S3/S4: 1.37 [1.21–1.54]) and incident prediabetes/T2D (HR [95% CI] in S4/F4/FF4: 1.33 [1.07–1.67]) without sex differences. The PhA (per 1-degree) was also positively associated with fasting glucose (beta [95% CI]: 1.2% [0.1–2.2%]) and insulin resistance (beta [95% CI]: 7.0% [2.3–11.7%]) cross-sectionally, and with changes in 2-h glucose longitudinally (beta [95% CI]: 4.5% [2.3–6.7%]) (S4/F4/FF4). In contrast, the PhA (per 1-degree) was inversely associated with prevalent T2D (odds ratio [95% CI] in S3/S4: 0.72 [0.56–0.93]) in men only. Conclusions The PhA at 50 kHz had stage-dependent associations with glucose metabolism, with higher values observed during subclinical stages and lower values after diabetes manifestation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ai et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: