Why the study?
Carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV), a gold standard measurement of vascular ageing, requires an experienced operator to measure pulse waves at two sites.
Can machine learning algorithms accurately estimate carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity from a single radial pressure wave?
Can machine learning algorithms accurately estimate carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity from a single radial pressure wave?
Machine learning algorithms, particularly recurrent neural networks, can estimate carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity from a single radial pressure wave with reasonable accuracy, potentially simplifying vascular ageing assessment.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports ML-based cfPWV estimation from radial waveforms in research; leaves open prospective clinical validation.
One of the European gold standard measurement of vascular ageing, a risk factor for cardiovascular disease, is the carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV), which requires an experienced operator to measure pulse waves at two sites. In this work, two machine learning pipelines were proposed to estimate cfPWV from the peripheral pulse wave measured at a single site, the radial pressure wave measured by applanation tonometry. The study populations were the Twins UK cohort containing 3,082 subjects aged from 18 to 110 years, and a database containing 4,374 virtual subjects aged from 25 to 75 years. The first pipeline uses Gaussian process regression to estimate cfPWV from features extracted from the radial pressure wave using pulse wave analysis. The mean difference and upper and lower limits of agreement (LOA) of the estimation on the 924 hold-out test subjects from the Twins UK cohort were 0.2 m/s, and 3.75 m/s & -3.34 m/s, respectively. The second pipeline uses a recurrent neural network (RNN) to estimate cfPWV from the entire radial pressure wave. The mean difference and upper and lower LOA of the estimation on the 924 hold-out test subjects from the Twins UK cohort were 0.05 m/s, and 3.21 m/s & -3.11m/s, respectively. The percentage error of the RNN estimates on the virtual subjects increased by less than 2% when adding 20% of random noise to the pressure waveform. These results show the possibility of assessing the vascular ageing using a single peripheral pulse wave (e.g. the radial pressure wave), instead of cfPWV. The proposed code for the machine learning pipelines is available from the following online depository (https://github.com/WeiweiJin/Estimate-Cardiovascular-Risk-from-Pulse-Wave-Signal).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jin et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: