Why the study?
New immunotoxicities to AAV and transgenes are emerging in humans, requiring better animal models to assess and overcome these immune responses.
Preclinical animal models are essential for understanding and overcoming emerging immunotoxicities associated with AAV vector-based gene therapies.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Preclinical insights may inform AAV trial design; leaves open clinical translation of stealth vectors and immunomodulation.
vector to human studies was not as successful. Despite significant progress in recent clinical trials for hemophilia, new immunotoxicities to AAV and transgene are emerging in humans that require better animal models to assess and overcome these responses. The animal models designed to address these immune complications have provided critical information to assess how vector dose, vector capsid processing, vector genome, difference in serotypes, and variations in vector delivery route can impact immunity and to develop approaches for overcoming pre-existing immunity. Additionally, a comprehensive dissection of innate, adaptive, and regulatory responses to AAV vectors in preclinical studies has provided a framework that can be utilized for development of immunomodulatory therapies to overcome or bypass immune responses and for developing strategic approaches toward engineering stealth AAV vectors that can circumvent immunity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Martino et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: