Why the study?
Does the presence of binding antibodies versus neutralizing antibodies affect AAV vector transduction efficiency in hepatocytes and mice?
Does the presence of binding antibodies versus neutralizing antibodies affect AAV vector transduction efficiency in hepatocytes and mice?
Neutralizing and binding antibodies have opposite effects on AAV vector transduction, with binding antibodies enhancing internalization and transgene expression.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Binding antibodies may enhance AAV transduction unlike NAbs; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change clinical vector use.
, imaging of hepatocytes exposed to AAV vectors pre-incubated with either NAbs or BAbs revealed that virus is taken up by cells in both cases. Whereas no successful transduction was observed when AAV was pre-incubated with NAbs, an increased capsid internalization and transgene expression was observed in the presence of BAbs. Accordingly, AAV8 vectors administered to mice passively immunized with anti-AAV8 BAbs showed a more efficient liver transduction and a unique vector biodistribution profile compared to mice immunized with NAbs. These results highlight a virtually opposite effect of neutralizing and binding antibodies on AAV vectors transduction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fitzpatrick et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: