PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 5, 2006Clinical Infectious Diseases200 citations

Diarrhea Etiology in a Children’s Hospital Emergency Department: A Prospective Cohort Study

View Full Paper
EKEileen J. KleinDBDaniel R. BosterJSJennifer R. Stapp

Key Points

  • To evaluate the frequency of pathogen recovery in children presenting to a pediatric emergency department with diarrhea and develop clinical criteria for ordering bacterial stool cultures.
  • Conducted a prospective cohort study of all pediatric patients presenting with diarrhea to a large regional emergency department from November 1998 through October 2001.
  • Evaluated 1,626 stool specimens for bacterial pathogens, along with subsets tested for Clostridium difficile toxin (n=688), parasites (n=656), and enteric viruses (n=417), correlating results with clinical and laboratory data.
  • Of 372 specimens undergoing complete testing, 176 (47%) yielded a pathogen, including rotavirus (n=85), C. difficile toxin (n=46), STEC (n=39, 28 serotype O157:H7), Salmonella (n=39), and Campylobacter (n=25).
  • Independent clinical predictors of bacterial infection included international travel, fever, and passing >10 stools in the preceding 24 hours.
  • Physician clinical judgment was nearly as accurate as a multivariable predictive model in identifying children likely to have positive bacterial stool cultures.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the frequency of recovery of pathogens from children with diarrhea who presented to a pediatric emergency department and characterized the associated illnesses, to develop guidelines for performing a bacterial enteric culture. METHODS: We conducted a prospective cohort study of all patients with diarrhea who presented to a large regional pediatric emergency department during the period from November 1998 through October 2001. A thorough microbiologic evaluation was performed on stool specimens, and the findings were correlated with case, physician, and laboratory data. RESULTS: A total of 1626 stool specimens were studied to detect diarrheagenic bacteria and, if there was a sufficient amount of stool, Clostridium difficile toxin (688 specimens), parasites (656 specimens), and viruses (417 specimens). One hundred seventy-six (47%) of 372 specimens that underwent complete testing yielded a bacterial pathogen (Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli, 39 specimens of which 28 were serotype O157:H7; Salmonella species, 39; Campylobacter species, 25; Shigella species, 14; and Yersinia enterocolitica, 2), a viral pathogen (rotavirus, 85 specimens; astrovirus, 27; adenovirus, 18; or rotavirus and astrovirus, 8), a diarrheagenic parasite (5 specimens); or C. difficile toxin (46 specimens). Samples from 2 patients yielded both bacterial and viral pathogens. A model to identify predictors of bacterial infection found that international travel, fever, and the passing of >10 stools in the prior 24 h were associated with the presence of a bacterial pathogen. Physician judgment regarding the need to perform a stool culture was almost as accurate as the model in predicting bacterial pathogens. CONCLUSIONS: Nearly one-half of the patients who presented to the emergency department with diarrhea had a definite or plausible pathogen in their stool specimens. We were unable to develop a model that was substantially better than physician judgment in identifying patients for whom bacterial culture would yield positive results. The unexpectedly high rate of C. difficile toxin warrants further examination.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Klein et al. (2006) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a01cbdae8ec6bd19dcb00a8https://doi.org/10.1086/507335
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper