Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Phytoplankton absorption and its dependence on the concentration of chlorophyll a(Chl-a), as represented by the Chl-a–specific absorption coefficient (a*φ(λ)), is important to support models of growth and for bio-optical remote sensing algorithms to retrieve Chl-a. The dynamics of the phytoplankton absorption coefficient (aφ(λ)) and a*φ(λ), and their dependencies on Chl-a, are described for Onondaga Lake, New York, over a 6-year period for which major changes in trophic state, Chl-a, and community composition occurred. Strong positive dependencies of aφ(λ) on Chl-aare reported for absorption peaks in both the blue and red spectral regions that are qualitatively similar to relationships for ocean waters but differ quantitatively. Average values of a*φ at wavelengths of 440 and 676 nm were 0.0347 and 0.0171 m2 mg−1, respectively, with coefficients of variation of 37 and 31%. Significant negative relationships between a*φ and Chl-a were observed for blue and green wavelengths that were qualitatively consistent with the influences of pigment packaging and the contribution of accessory pigments to absorption. The operation of these influences is demonstrated through various forms of data analysis that resolved the following significant relationships: (1) negative dependence of the ratio aφ(440):aφ(676) on Chl-a; (2) flattening of aφ spectra in the blue and increases at the red maximum, with increases in Chl-a; and (3) negative dependence of aφ(490):aφ(676) on Chl-a. Values of a*φ(440) and a*φ(676) obtained for Onondaga Lake are considered in the context of the limited population reported for other inland waters and selected marine systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Perkins et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: