This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
This study aims to improve the predictive accuracy of metropolitan planning organizations’ (MPOs’) travel demand models (TDM) by unraveling the factors influencing transportation mode choices. By exploring the interplay between trip characteristics, socioeconomics, built environment features, and regional conditions, we aim to address existing gaps in MPOs’ TDMs which revolve around the need to also integrate non-motorized modes and a more comprehensive array of features. Additionally, our objective is to develop a more robust predictive model compared to the current nested logit (NL) and multinomial logit (MNL) models commonly employed by MPOs. We apply a one-vs-rest random forest (RF) model to predict mode choices (Home-based-Work, Home-Based-Other, and non-home-based) for over 800,000 trips by 80,000 households across 29 US regions. Validation results demonstrate the RF model’s superior performance compared to conventional NL/MNL models. Key findings highlight that increased travel time and distance are associated with more auto trips, while household vehicle ownership significantly affects car and transit choices. Built environment features, such as activity density, transit density, and intersection density, also play crucial roles in mode preferences. This study offers a more robust predictive framework that can be directly applied in MPO TDMs, contributing to more accurate and inclusive transportation planning.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kalantari et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: