Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Greenhouses that are well sealed can result in carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) drawdown and suppressed plant growth. While growers can add supplemental CO 2 , it is unknown how supplemental CO 2 fits within the framework of sustainable crop production in greenhouses. In this study, supplemental CO 2 was used in combination with reduced temperatures to evaluate the productivity of ‘Grand Rapids’ lettuce ( Latuca sativa ) compared with a traditionally maintained, warmer, and well-insulated greenhouse without supplemental CO 2 at a commercial facility. Simulations using Virtual Grower software based on identical greenhouses compared fuel use and carbon (C) consumed because of heating and CO 2 supplementation. Models were verified with measurements in a well-sealed commercial greenhouse; CO 2 quickly decreased to below 300 ppm in a nonsupplemented greenhouse containing plants. Supplemental CO 2 boosted total leaf number and mass of lettuce even though temperatures were maintained 3 °F lower in elevated CO 2 than in the traditional management scenario. Maintaining a cooler greenhouse but adding CO 2 decreased total carbon (C) consumed (by combined fuel use and CO 2 supplementation) by 7% during the 3-month season that required a well-sealed greenhouse. Additionally, fuel savings because of lower temperature set points paid for the cost of adding CO 2 . The use of CO 2 enrichment should be considered as a tool in sustainable systems when its use can counteract the plant growth and development reductions brought on by lowered temperatures.
Jonathan M. Frantz (Sat,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: