Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The stability of regression coefficients over the observation set (“regional homogeneity”) is typically assessed by means of a Chow test or within a seemingly unrelated regression (SUR) framework. When spatial error autocorrelation is present in cross‐sectional equations the traditional tests are no longer applicable. I evaluate this both in formal terms as well as empirically. I introduce a taxonomy of spatial effects in models for structural instability, and discuss its implication for testing. I compare the performance of traditional tests, robust approaches, maximum‐likelihood procedures and pretest techniques by means of a series of simple Monte Carlo experiments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Luc Anselin (1990) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: