Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the influence of different post-polymerization protocols (PP) on polymerization depth and resultant degree of conversion (DC), Martens hardness (HM), flexural strength (FS) and elastic modulus (EM) of 3D-printed specimens with and without aging regimes. DC, HM, FS and EM were tested initially and after thermal cycling (10.000x, 5/55 °C) and within three different depths (0 mm, 2 mm, 4 mm). Data were analyzed with Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Kruskal-Wallis, Mann-Whitney-U test, Wilcoxon signed-rank test and Spearman's correlation (p < 0.05). RESULTS: PP 5 consistently showed high values for both aging regimes, while PP 3 presented the lowest results. Artificial aging increased the properties for most groups, some decreased. For DC 25/30 PP-groups and HM 27/30 PP-groups showed higher values for 0 mm depths in comparison with 2 mm and 4 mm depths. SIGNIFICANCE: Post-polymerization enhances the properties of the tested specimens intended for fixed dental prostheses (FDPs). PP 5 is recommended because it consistently resulted in highest DC, HM, FS, and EM across most groups, especially when combined with depths of 0 mm for DC and HM. Depths of 2 mm and 4 mm mostly resulted in lower values. Among LED groups, wavelengths of 385 nm and 400 nm are recommended for all materials, while wavelength of 460 nm seems not advisable.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gekle et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: