Key result
Persistent post-TAVI conduction disturbances are linked to higher risk of CV death or HF hospitalization.
Why the study?
Conduction disturbances are common after TAVI, but prognostic differences among conduction disturbance subtypes, including transient and persistent forms, have not been systematically evaluated.
Does persistent conduction disturbance predict adverse outcomes in patients with aortic stenosis undergoing TAVI?
Cohort (n=1,007)
Yes
Does persistent conduction disturbance predict adverse outcomes in patients with aortic stenosis undergoing TAVI?
Persistent conduction disturbances after TAVI, but not transient or pre-existing ones, independently predict cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalization.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May warrant closer post-TAVI surveillance for persistent conduction disturbances; leaves open whether targeted interventions improve outcomes.
BACKGROUND: Conduction disturbances (CD) are common in patients with aortic stenosis (AS) undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Although various types of CD occur, the prognostic differences among CD subtypes, including transient and persistent CD, have not been systematically evaluated. METHODS: This retrospective two-center study included 1007 patients with AS who underwent TAVI between August 2016 and September 2024. According to Valve Academic Research Consortium-3 (VARC-3) criteria, CD were defined as left or right bundle branch block, intraventricular conduction delay with QRS ≥ 120 ms, high-degree atrioventricular block (including complete atrioventricular block), or new permanent pacemaker implantation. Patients were categorized into 4 groups: pre-existing CD, transient CD (resolved by discharge or within 7 days), persistent CD (present at discharge or beyond 7 days), or no CD. The primary endpoint was a composite of cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalization up to 2 years. RESULTS: Of the 1007 patients, 234 (23.2%) had pre-existing CD, 112 (11.1%) had persistent CD, 159 (15.8%) had transient CD, and 502 (49.9%) had no CD. During a median follow-up of 645 days, 109 patients (10.8%) experienced the primary endpoint. The persistent CD group had a higher incidence of the primary endpoint than the other groups (log-rank P = 0.023). CONCLUSIONS: Persistent CD, but not transient or pre-existing CD, independently predicted adverse outcomes after TAVI. This study highlights the prognostic importance of CD persistence for post-TAVI risk stratification.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Okita et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Aortic stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) (n=1,007). Persistent conduction disturbances vs. Pre-existing, transient, or no conduction disturbances was evaluated on Composite of cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalization up to 2 years (p=0.023). Persistent conduction disturbances after TAVI predicted a higher risk of cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalization compared to other groups (overall event rate 10.8%; log-rank P=0.023).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: