Key result
DOACs are associated with similar six-month LVT resolution rates as warfarin.
Why the study?
Appropriate anticoagulation is essential for LVT causing cardioembolic stroke, but the optimal choice between warfarin and DOACs remains individualized and unestablished.
Do DOACs improve thrombus resolution and reduce complications compared to warfarin in adult patients with ischemic stroke secondary to left ventricular thrombus?
Observational (n=48)
No
Do DOACs improve thrombus resolution and reduce complications compared to warfarin in adult patients with ischemic stroke secondary to left ventricular thrombus?
DOACs appear non-inferior to warfarin for the resolution of left ventricular thrombus at 6 months, with a potential trend toward fewer complications.
Should not yet change practice; leaves open randomized confirmation of DOAC efficacy for left ventricular thrombus.
OBJECTIVE: LVT is a leading etiology of cardioembolic stroke, and appropriate anticoagulation therapy is essential. However, the choice of anticoagulant in LVT patients remains based on the individual patient and physician. The objective of this study is to evaluate the relative clinical outcomes of warfarin and direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) agents for patients with ischemic stroke due to left ventricular thrombus (LVT). METHODS: This retrospective observational study included 48 adult patients treated for ischemic stroke secondary to LVT at our institution between 9/2017 and 12/2024. Patients were included if they were anticoagulated with warfarin or a DOAC and had follow-up cardiac imaging to assess thrombus resolution within 6 months of LVT diagnosis. We evaluated rates of LVT resolution and complications by anticoagulant usage. RESULTS: By 6 months, 79% of patients achieved thrombus resolution. Five patients were switched from warfarin to a DOAC. There was no statistically significant difference in thrombus resolution rates between warfarin, Apixaban, and Rivaroxaban use at initial diagnosis (p = 0.6). However, thrombus resolution was associated with DOAC use at 6 month follow-up (p = 0.07). Warfarin use trended towards a higher rate of complications, although the overall number of complications was too small to reach statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that DOACs are non-inferior to warfarin for resolution of LVT by 6 months. Warfarin may be associated with greater complication risk. These factors should be taken into consideration when selecting an anticoagulant agent for patients diagnosed with LVT.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Ischemic stroke due to left ventricular thrombus (LVT) (n=48). Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) vs. Warfarin was evaluated on Thrombus resolution at 6 months (p=0.6). Direct oral anticoagulants were non-inferior to warfarin for the resolution of left ventricular thrombus by 6 months (p=0.6), with 79% of all patients achieving thrombus resolution.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: