Key result
Mitral valve repair linked to ~77% lower in-hospital mortality versus replacement in degenerative MR.
Why the study?
With the rise of transcatheter therapies, real-world data on surgical management, repair rates, outcomes, and center-level practices for degenerative mitral valve disease are increasingly needed.
What are the contemporary surgical outcomes and repair rates for degenerative mitral regurgitation in real-world practice?
Observational (n=2,135)
Yes
What are the contemporary surgical outcomes and repair rates for degenerative mitral regurgitation in real-world practice?
In a contemporary real-world registry, mitral valve repair for degenerative MR achieved high rates (80%) and low in-hospital mortality, though outcomes varied by center volume and patient complexity.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Low mortality with predominant repair supports current practice in degenerative MR; leaves open randomized confirmation of benefit versus replacement.
OBJECTIVE: Degenerative mitral valve (MV) disease is the leading mitral regurgitation (MR) etiology in Western countries, representing a significant health burden. With the rise of transcatheter therapies, real-world data on surgical management, repair rates, outcomes, and center-level practices are increasingly needed. METHODS: From MITRACURE, a multicenter registry of 40 centers across Canada and France of consecutive adult patients who underwent surgery for MR in 2019, we selected the subset of patients with degenerative MR. RESULTS: MV surgery was performed in 2,135 patients with degenerative MR (70% male, 65±12 years); 37% were in NYHA III/IV, only 17% were considered asymptomatic, and early intervention was performed in only 4%. MV repair rate was 80%, with a 6% intraoperative repair failure rate. In-hospital mortality was 2.3%, 1.4% for repair vs 6.2% for replacement, P<0.0001. Major complications occurred in 20%, higher for replacement and combined procedures. Independent predictors of mortality included NYHA III/IV, type of surgery, and EuroSCORE II. Repair rates declined with age, comorbidities, and complex anatomy, and increased with center volume (68%, 77%, and 84% in low, intermediate, and high-volume centers, respectively; P<0.0001). Sex was not associated with repair rates after adjustment. CONCLUSIONS: In this large real-world cohort from two publicly funded healthcare systems, many patients with degenerative MR were referred late for surgery, and early intervention was rare. While in-hospital mortality was low overall, outcomes varied across subgroups. MV repair declined with age and MV anatomical complexity. High-volume centers had better outcomes, supporting earlier referral, structured pathways, and surgical centralization to optimize care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bouchard et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Degenerative mitral regurgitation (n=2,135). Mitral valve repair vs. Mitral valve replacement was evaluated on In-hospital mortality (p=<0.0001). In patients with degenerative mitral regurgitation, mitral valve repair was associated with lower in-hospital mortality compared to replacement (1.4% vs 6.2%, P<0.0001).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: