Key result
ICMP shows no significant difference in right ventricular dysfunction rates compared with DCMP.
Why the study?
Ischemic cardiomyopathy and dilated cardiomyopathies impair right ventricular function through distinct mechanisms, yet comparative data remain limited.
Does right ventricular function differ between patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and dilated cardiomyopathy with LVEF <35%?
Observational (n=110)
Does right ventricular function differ between patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and dilated cardiomyopathy with LVEF <35%?
Absolute Event Rate: 60% vs 73.3%
p-value: p=0.18
Right ventricular dysfunction commonly accompanies severe left ventricular impairment in both ischemic and dilated cardiomyopathy, with comparable echocardiographic parameters but higher right ventricular systolic pressure in dilated cardiomyopathy.
Export Background: Ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICMP) and Dilated cardiomyopathies (DCMP) impair right ventricular (RV) function through distinct mechanisms, yet comparative data remain limited. This study evaluated and compared RV function in ICMP and DCMP patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF <35%) using 2D transthoracic echocardiography. Materials and Methods: This prospective study included consecutive patients with ICMP or DCMP and LVEF < 35%. Comprehensive RV assessment included tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE), fractional area change (FAC), Right Ventricular Myocardial Performance Index (RVMPI), and tissue Doppler S’ velocity. Results: A total of 110 patients were evaluated (59.1% ICMP; 40.9% DCMP). LVEF was comparable between ICMP and DCMP (25.82 ± 5.15% vs. 23.69 ± 6.35%; P = 0.06). RV functional parameters including TAPSE (15.05 ± 3.66 vs. 14.69 ± 3.48 mm; P = 0.61), S′ velocity (9.17 ± 1.65 vs. 8.54 ± 1.89 cm/s; P = 0.06), FAC (34.01 ± 9.10% vs. 33.04 ± 11.34%; P = 0.64), and RVMPI (0.54 ± 0.20 vs. 0.58 ± 0.26; P = 0.40). RV dysplasia (RVD) was observed in 60.0% of ICMP and 73.3% of DCMP patients (P = 0.18), whereas RVSP was higher in DCMP (P = 0.003). LVEF was associated with TAPSE and S′ in DCMP but not ICMP. TAPSE independently predicted RV dysfunction in both groups, where RVMPI (β = –1.1; 95% confidence interval: –2.05 to –0.14; P = 0.03) was predictive only in DCMP. Conclusion: RV dysfunction is commonly accompanies severe left ventricular impairment in both CMP, with higher burden in DCMP. TAPSE and S′ velocity associated with RVD, underscoring their prognostic relevance in advanced cardiomyopathy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Agarwal et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Ischemic and Dilated Cardiomyopathy with LVEF <35% (n=110). Ischemic cardiomyopathy vs. Dilated cardiomyopathy was evaluated on Right ventricular dysplasia (RVD) (p=0.18). Ischemic cardiomyopathy and dilated cardiomyopathy with LVEF <35% showed similar rates of right ventricular dysplasia (60.0% vs 73.3%, P=0.18) and comparable RV functional parameters.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: