In this paper, the dynamics, stability, and rational model analysis for designing a whole roller carding system are presented. The plant is a stable but sluggish system of web uniformity. The PID controller is discussed for designing a closed-loop system of roller carding. Since the PI controller is basically a low-pass filter, the compensated system usually has a slower rise time and longer settling time. At first glance, it may seem that PI control improves steady-state error at the expense of stability. Moreover, after the location of the controller's zero is properly selected, both the transient response and steady-state error can be improved. At the same time, good tracking and step disturbance rejection can be achieved by moving all of the poles of the closed-loop system into the left half of the plane during the operation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kuo et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: