Why the study?
A standard protocol to isolate cardiac fibroblasts and maintain them in their quiescent phenotype in vitro was needed to better understand cardiac fibroblast biology and their response to profibrotic stimuli.
Culturing adult murine cardiac fibroblasts on compliant substrates maintains their quiescent phenotype, whereas non-compliant substrates induce myofibroblast activation, providing a reproducible in vitro model for studying cardiac fibrosis.
Compliant substrates enable quiescent fibroblast culture in vitro; leaves open translation to human fibrosis therapies.
Cardiac fibroblasts play a critical role in extracellular matrix homeostasis, wound healing, and cardiac interstitial fibrosis: the latter being a pathophysiological response to a chronic increase in afterload. Using a standard protocol to isolate cardiac fibroblasts and maintain them in their quiescent phenotype in vitro will enable a better understanding of cardiac fibroblast biology and their role in the response to profibrotic stimuli. Here, we describe an enzymatic method for isolating cardiac fibroblasts. The resulting cells are maintained on either a collagen-coated hydrogel-bound polystyrene (compliant) substrate or standard polystyrene culture dishes (non-compliant) to obtain quiescent fibroblasts and activated fibroblasts (myofibroblasts), respectively. Fibroblasts maintained on a non-compliant substrate developed a myofibroblast phenotype, in which the αSMA immunoreactivity was markedly elevated and incorporated into the stress fibers. In contrast, ventricular and atrial fibroblasts retain their quiescent phenotype for up to 3 passages when maintained on a compliant substrate. Hence, the methodology described herein provides a simple and reproducible way to isolate adult murine atrial and ventricular cardiac fibroblasts from a single animal and, by selecting a substrate with the appropriate compliance, examine the mediators of fibroblast activation or inactivation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sahadevan et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: