Why the study?
NIDCM responds variably to intramyocardial MSC injection, prompting the hypothesis that patient genotype influences responsiveness to MSC therapy.
Does genetic profile influence responsiveness to intramyocardial injection of mesenchymal stem cells in patients with non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy?
Does genetic profile influence responsiveness to intramyocardial injection of mesenchymal stem cells in patients with non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy?
The genetic profile of patients with non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy strongly predicts their clinical, functional, and structural response to mesenchymal stem cell therapy.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Genetic variants may attenuate stem cell therapy response in non-ischemic cardiomyopathy; leaves open prospective validation before guiding selection.
BACKGROUND: Non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (NIDCM) responds variably to intramyocardial injection of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). We hypothesized that NIDCM genotype may influence responsiveness to MSC therapy and performed genotyping on all patients in the POSEIDON-DCM trial. METHODS: POSEIDON-DCM patients (n = 34) underwent genetic sequence analysis and deletion/duplication testing. The results were classified as positive for pathological variants (PV+; n = 8), negative for any variants (V-; n = 6), or as variants of uncertain significance (VUS; n = 20). All outcomes of therapy were analysed for each category of genetic results. FINDINGS: The 3 groups were indistinguishable at baseline with regard to ejection fraction (EF), demographics, medication use, or functional parameters. V- patients had an increase in EF at 12 months: +13.6% (IQR = +7.8%; +20.5%; p = 0.002), compared with VUS (+6.5%; IQR = +0.9%, +11.1%; p = 0.005) and PV+(-5.9%; IQR = -12.7%, +1.0; p = 0.2; p = 0.01 between groups). Six-minute walk distance improved in V- patients, but not in VUS and PV+. V- patients improved MLHFQ, compared to the other 2 groups, which did not improve over time. EPCCFUs increased by 9.7 ± 1.9 in V- (p = 0.009) compared to VUS and PV+ patients. V- patients had one-year survival (100%) compared with VUS (85%) and PV+ (40%; p = 0.015 log-rank). Similarly, MACE rates were lower in V- (0%) than PV+ (61.9%) or VUS (42.2%; p = 0.021 log-rank). INTERPRETATION: Our findings support the concept that the genetic profile of NIDCM patients plays a role in responsiveness to MSC therapy, with V- patients more likely to benefit and the converse for PV+. This observation emphasizes the need for further genetic studies, because of important implications for the management of NIDCM syndromes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rieger et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: