Why the study?
Antiplatelet agents carry an inherent bleeding risk associated with adverse outcomes, creating an unmet need for novel therapies that inhibit thrombosis while maintaining hemostasis.
There is an unmet clinical need to develop novel antiplatelet therapies that inhibit thrombosis while maintaining hemostasis to improve outcomes in atherothrombotic diseases.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Emphasizes unmet need for safer antiplatelet agents; leaves open which pipeline candidates merit clinical translation.
receptor antagonists, have significantly reduced morbidity and mortality associated with arterial thrombosis. Their pharmacological characteristics, including pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamics profiles, have been extensively studied, and a significant number of clinical trials assessing their efficacy and safety in various clinical settings have established antithrombotic efficacy. Notwithstanding, antiplatelet agents carry an inherent risk of bleeding. Given that bleeding is associated with adverse cardiovascular outcomes and mortality, there is an unmet clinical need to develop novel antiplatelet therapies that inhibit thrombosis while maintaining hemostasis. In this review, we present the currently available antiplatelet agents, with a particular focus on their targets, pharmacological characteristics, and patterns of use. We will further discuss the novel antiplatelet therapies in the pipeline, with the goal of improved clinical outcomes among patients with atherothrombotic diseases.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jourdi et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: