Systematic review evaluates treatment effectiveness and side effects of sofpironium bromide in hyperhidrosis, suggesting careful consideration of its use.
Sofpironium bromide is a recently approved topical anticholinergic agent for primary axillary hyperhidrosis, developed using a retrometabolic approach to limit systemic side effects. However, randomized evidence about its effects has not yet been quantitatively synthesized. This meta-analysis aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of topical sofpironium bromide compared with a vehicle in patients with primary axillary hyperhidrosis. PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing topical sofpironium bromide with a vehicle. Risk ratios (RRs) and mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled using random-effects models in Review Manager 7.2.0 (The Cochrane Collaboration, London, UK). Five RCTs, including 1,398 participants, were included, of whom 807 (57.7%) received topical sofpironium bromide. Compared with vehicle, sofpironium bromide significantly reduced gravimetric sweat production (GSP) at the end of treatment (MD -25.27 mg; 95% CI -40.15 to -10.40) and increased the likelihood of achieving at least a two-point improvement in the Hyperhidrosis Disease Severity Scale (HDSS) (RR 3.27; 95% CI 1.57-6.80). Discontinuation due to adverse events was more frequent in the sofpironium bromide group (RR 9.83; 95% CI 1.82-53.17). Adverse events occurred more frequently in the treatment group, including application-site dermatitis (RR 5.26; 95% CI 2.05-13.48), application-site pain (RR 4.63; 95% CI 2.08-10.28), pruritus (RR 5.97; 95% CI 1.98-18.02), and dry mouth (RR 15.45; 95% CI 5.35-44.62). No significant increase in serious adverse events was observed. Overall, this meta-analysis supports the efficacy of sofpironium bromide for primary axillary hyperhidrosis, while treatment decisions should be weighed against potential side effects.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Martani et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: