Retrospective study evaluates Class I IVD recalls using FDA data, suggesting improvements in safety measures.
BACKGROUND: In vitro diagnostic (IVD) devices play pivotal role in disease management by enabling an accurate and timely diagnosis. Diagnostic inaccuracies can harm public health by delaying or misguiding treatment. METHOD: A systematic analysis of the publicly available U.S. FDA recall database (201-2024) was conducted to evaluate the trends in Class I IVD recalls, focusing on approved class, recall reasons, manufacturers, and premarket notification (510 k) exemption status. Class II and III recalls were excluded from this study. RESULT: = 69) IVDs. Among the Approval-Class I IVDs (31), 12 were attributed to deficiencies in process control. In Approval-Class II, nine recalls were attributed to process control issues, non-conforming materials, device design, labeling change control, and other flaws. Notably, 23 of 31 Approval-Class I IVDs were 510(k)-exempt. CONCLUSION: Improving process control, device design, and manufacturing is essential to reducing Class I IVD recalls. Strengthening regulatory strategies through harmonized quality standards and AI-based post-market surveillance can help detect safety issues early, enhancing patient safety and public health outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Simran et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: