Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Study examines state governance frameworks for AI in healthcare, highlighting privacy concerns and regulatory inconsistencies.
The increasing integration of artificial intelligence in healthcare services has raised concerns about privacy, accountability, and public trust, particularly for vulnerable populations. This study examines state-level governance frameworks regulating artificial intelligence in the United States healthcare. It analyzes 141 enacted state laws to identify key regulatory themes, including data privacy, electronic health records, patient consent, biometric data, and algorithmic transparency. Findings reveal regional disparities and fragmented legal protections, suggesting that regulatory inconsistency may undermine public trust and exacerbate healthcare inequalities. The paper concludes with theory-informed policy recommendations to strengthen governance frameworks while supporting responsible innovation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Robles et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: