Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The Release Summary organizes mass-gap formalization for mathematical proofs, indicating necessary verification steps.
# Release Summary ## MGAP4D v1.6 Work Unit Chain Final Review Packet This release packages the MGAP4D v1.6 proof-engineering frontier into a Zenodo-ready archive. ### Core contribution The archive organizes the mass-gap formalization path around a terminal work-unit chain: 1. WU-R1-ELL-CLM2. WU-R1-PROJECTION3. WU-R2-REDUCING-SPECTRUM4. WU-R4-LOWER-BOUND5. WU-R3-UNBOUNDED-KERNEL6. WU-R7-ATOM-EXACT-GAP7. WU-GLOBAL-FINAL-AUDIT ### Recorded mathematical target ```textm_gap = 33/20∃ ψ*, H_exc ψ* = (33/20) ψ*33/20 ∈ σ_p(H_exc)``` ### Audit status ```textLean files: 12308Declarations: 52137sorry: 0admit: 0axiom: 0constant: 0``` ### Review boundary This release should be described as a proof-engineering review packet and closure execution bundle. It should not be described as a fully public-certified mathematical proof unless and until independent replay and exact API binding verification are completed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hidetoshi Itakura (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: