Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Preprint describes an internal theorem and formal proof architecture for mass gaps in four dimensions, suggesting new analytical methods.
This preprint presents the MGAP4D proof architecture for a four-dimensional mass-gap formalization and records the internal normalized 33/20 gap theorem. The central statement is formulated inside the MGAP4D Hilbert–operator framework: after removing the vacuum line, the excited Hamiltonian Hexc has spectral lower bound 33/20, the value 33/20 is realized by a nonzero excited state, and the resulting excited-sector mass gap is exactly 33/20 in MGAP4D internal normalized units. The paper also describes the accompanying Lean-oriented closure-priority and work-unit execution bundle. The formal archive is organized into seven work units: construction of the vacuum functional, projection onto vacuum/excited sectors, reducing decomposition and spectral union, analytic lower-bound transfer, unbounded zero-form kernel route, atom persistence and exact-gap extraction, and final audit gating. The accompanying review packet records source-hygiene statistics with sorry = 0, admit = 0, axiom = 0, and constant = 0 for the generated Lean source archive. Scope note: this release states the MGAP4D internal theorem and its proof architecture. Public mathematical certification remains review-gated pending independent replay, exact external API binding verification, and reviewer audit.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hidetoshi Itakura (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: