Key result
Botulinum toxin A was not more effective than placebo in reducing pain-related post-stroke spasticity in either the early or late treatment phases.
Why the study?
Spasticity and pain are common post-stroke complications, and the efficacy of botulinum toxin in reducing pain-related post-stroke spasticity at different treatment timings is unclear.
Does Botulinum toxin A reduce pain-related post-stroke spasticity compared to placebo in early or late treatment periods?
Meta-Analysis
Does Botulinum toxin A reduce pain-related post-stroke spasticity compared to placebo in early or late treatment periods?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Current evidence does not demonstrate clear superiority of Botulinum toxin A over placebo for reducing pain-related post-stroke spasticity in either early or late treatment phases.
Spasticity is a common complication associated with stroke, and around 72% of stroke patients will develop pain during the disease. Botulinum toxin (BoNT) is a safe and efficacious treatment for spasticity and can improve associated complications, including pain. Hence, this meta-analysis aims to establish whether BoNT can reduce pain-related post-stroke spasticity (pPSS) in the early treatment period (<12 weeks post-stroke) or in the late period (>12 weeks post-stroke) based on the available evidence. This study also aims to establish the dose–response relationship of BoNT-A in pPSS. Based on pooled data from multiple studies, there is no significant difference in the scores measuring pPSS between patients who received early BoNT-A injections and those who received a placebo. This finding suggests that within the early treatment period, BoNT-A may not be more effective than a placebo in reducing pPSS. However, it is important to note that the data for early BoNT-A injections are limited, indicating that research is needed to draw definitive conclusions [z = 3.90 (p < 0.0001)]. While BoNT-A appears somewhat more effective than a placebo in the late phase, as indicated by the small to moderate positive z value, there is not enough evidence to confidently claim superiority over a placebo [z = 1.48 (p = 0.14)].
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tamayo et al. (2025) conducted a meta-analysis in Pain-related post-stroke limb spasticity. Botulinum toxin A (BoNT-A) vs. Placebo was evaluated on Scores measuring pain-related post-stroke spasticity (pPSS) (p=<0.0001 (early phase); 0.14 (late phase)). Botulinum toxin A was not more effective than placebo in reducing pain-related post-stroke spasticity in either the early or late treatment phases.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: